From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4a6fe6b4d76b6246 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: Dummy Date: 2000/01/11 Message-ID: <387B3883.FEEC2D19@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 571161803 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <387b166a.3821486@newsread.albacom.net> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 11 Jan 2000 14:03:17 +0100, 130.125.13.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Simic_10111: You will read more <> answers about it in c.l.a but... > has Ada anything to do with OOP? Ada95 (the current Ada): yes. ISO standard! > is Ada conceptually easy and intuitive? Very subjective question... I would say: it is a model. Unambiguous, clear names, easy to read, re-read, program. The precise conception of Ada leads the compilers to point most errors at compile-time. At beginning it may appear pedantic to death, but it saves ages of run-time debugging. > is Ada an imperative language? Y. > d'ye have any tutorial (apart Lovelace) or ebook for me to study? The sites http://www.adahome.com/ and http://www.adapower.com/ lead huge Web resources in Ada... Some links from home page... HTH -- Gautier _____\\________________\_______\ http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/