From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,99a6311c4195e21b X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,99a6311c4195e21b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "William B. Clodius" Subject: Re: Matrix Multiplication Date: 1999/12/16 Message-ID: <3859191C.CCD9860A@lanl.gov>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 561578210 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <385699B5.59C14D03@lmco.com> <838koc$b6d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3857E220.26AE90BB@lanl.gov> <8390te$ksp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <385811C8.1E138A9E@lanl.gov> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@lanl.gov X-Trace: newshost.lanl.gov 945363228 7650 128.165.58.113 (16 Dec 1999 16:53:48 GMT) Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Dec 1999 16:53:48 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Date: 1999-12-16T16:53:48+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > > Anyway, there's an important non-technical issue: How much money are > people willing to expend on making optimizing compilers. > It sometimes seeems likee its more than they are willing to spend on correct compilers.