From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,99a6311c4195e21b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,99a6311c4195e21b X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public From: "E. Robert Tisdale" Subject: Re: Matrix Multiplication Date: 1999/12/15 Message-ID: <38570551.162AE796@netwood.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 560809843 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <385699B5.59C14D03@lmco.com> <3856E1FD.26C05235@netwood.net> <3856FD3F.8291A71C@ucar.edu> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Date: 1999-12-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Dennis Shea wrote: > A few minor comments: the fortran standard is f90 [f95]. > f90 has numerous array processing > and matrix manipulation intrinsic procedures. > One of the intrinsics is "matmul" ===> z = matmul(x,y). > Under Ideal conditions a compiler writer targeting a particular machine > could take advantage of the machine's architecture and > it would be difficult to beat "matmul" > unless ADA [of which I know little] has an matmul equivalent. > Unfortunately, there is no GNU f95 compiler [yet]. That's even easier. The Ada version could call the f90 intrinsic too. All you would need to do is link the f90 library which contains matmul. E. Robert Tisdale