From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b6619eb9cada212 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Matthew Heaney" Subject: Re: Help me to chose between ADA 95 and C++ Date: 1999/12/14 Message-ID: <3855e3cd_1@news1.prserv.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 560421486 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <01bf37fb$a91afb60$0564a8c0@IS-D2D04C.test> <829rbv$a8m$1@nntp6.atl.mindspring.net> <01bf3e32$0b9dc880$022a6282@dieppe> <385112AE.7E2CFA9@rdel.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net X-Trace: 14 Dec 1999 06:29:33 GMT, 129.37.62.192 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services Mime-version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <385112AE.7E2CFA9@rdel.co.uk> , Chris Powell wrote: > I would not recommend Ada 95 for OO development. Okay, it has all the > benefits of Ada 83 for type safety, etc, but the syntax of its class > programming constructs seems to make the code long winded, obscure and > error prone. I can give examples if anyone is interested/disagrees. Please do so, especially any examples that you think are "error prone." Perhaps there is just a misunderstanding about how to properly declare a type. -- The political forces that try to eliminate evolution from science classrooms impose a narrow, sectarian doctrine on our educational systems. This imposition represents an affront not only to the constitutional separation of church and state but also to the moral and intellectual integrity embedded in that constitution.