From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,72340e997bfd5289 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Matthew Heaney" Subject: Re: array size Date: 1999/12/12 Message-ID: <38532e6d_2@news1.prserv.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 559600339 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <101219991605504828%hopperj@macconnect.com> <3852831a.0@news.pacifier.com> <111219991626405236%hopperj@macconnect.com> <38532c6a.0@news.pacifier.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net X-Trace: 12 Dec 1999 05:11:09 GMT, 32.101.8.154 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services Mime-version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <38532c6a.0@news.pacifier.com> , "DuckE" wrote: > BTW: When I tested your code on NT I was guessing that I would need some > sort of component_size representation clause in the array declaration (as > has been described in the 3 bit array thread). I was actually suprised at > my result. In general, if you want to completely specify the representation of the type, you should specify everything, including the Component_Size. Use pragma Pack when you want to optimize for space, and when you don't care about exact representation.