From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,72340e997bfd5289
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "DuckE" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: array size
Date: 1999/12/11
Message-ID: <38532c6a.0@news.pacifier.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 559598253
References: <101219991605504828%hopperj@macconnect.com>
 <3852831a.0@news.pacifier.com> <111219991626405236%hopperj@macconnect.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Trace: 11 Dec 1999 21:02:34 PST, 216.65.140.219
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "DuckE" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

BTW: When I tested your code on NT I was guessing that I would need some
sort of component_size representation clause in the array declaration (as
has been described in the 3 bit array thread).  I was actually suprised at
my result.

SteveD

James E. Hopper <hopperj@macconnect.com> wrote in message
news:111219991626405236%hopperj@macconnect.com...
> Steve,
> that pretty much answers my question about it being a bug in machten.
> the problem arose initially on solaris (it was sent to me as a
> question) and the machten port gives the same answer as the solaris
> port. but if NT gives the expected answer then there is possibly
> something wrong with gnat???  I will send it on to ACT
>
> THANKS!  jim
>
>