From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8201deea80f1752a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: darrellhiggins@uswest.net (Darrell Higgins) Subject: Re: 3-bit array porting problem from ADA83 to GreenHills ADA95 Date: 1999/12/03 Message-ID: <384728ff.588431360@news.uswest.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 556036519 References: <382386fe.85782690@news.uswest.net> X-Trace: news.uswest.net 944187235 216.161.182.196 (Thu, 02 Dec 1999 20:13:55 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 20:13:55 CST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 06 Nov 1999 01:51:35 GMT, darrellhiggins@uswest.net (Darrell Higgins) wrote: >Has anybody dealt (successfully) with a port of ADA83 that contains >3-bit arrays of enumerated types into GH ADA95? GreenHills does not >support 3-bit arrays and we are searching for techniques/solutions to >achieve this port. >Our application constrains us to keep the arrays, due to the high LOC >affected. So how about it...Trash the compiler and look for a new one? >Be kind in reply - I'm a nervous ADA newbie. A follow up to this thread: Green Hills provided an update for their compiler that solved our porting problem. Their response to our need came at a very timely point in our project, so - Many thanks to Green Hills from Raytheon at the F-15 Systems Development Center at Luke AFB, Arizona.