From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e3ad0eba55db3514,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: task activation
Date: 1999/11/20
Message-ID: <383733d3_1@news1.prserv.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 551083748
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net
X-Trace: 20 Nov 1999 23:50:43 GMT, 32.101.8.100
Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
Mime-version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

It is my understanding that a task "activates" when you hit the begin 
part of the block in which the task is declared:

procedure Main is
  task O is ...
  task body O is ...;
begin
  <whatever>
end Main;

In this example, task O activates when procedure Main reaches its begin.

Now, suppose we wanted to activate the task earlier than that.  Let's
declare O in a nested package:

procedure Main is
  package P is
    task O is ...;
  end;
  package body P is
    task body O is ...;
  end;
begin
  <whatever>
end;


Does task O activate when

1) the elaboration of nested package P completes (hit the begin part of
P's body); that is, prior to hitting the begin part of Main.  Or,

2) no, the nesting doesn't matter, and O still activates when you hit
the begin part of procedure Main.


Another question: suppose package P is a library level package (and
therefore task O is a library level task).  Does O get activated when

1) you hit the begin part of P's body; that is, prior to hitting the
begin part of Ada main subprogram Main?  Or,

2) no, the library-levelness doesn't matter, and O still is activated
when you hit the begin part of the Ada main.


Thanks,
Matt

--
Time and again the nation's courts have ruled that creationism, as a
religious dogma, cannot be taught in science classes. Now, creationists
are advancing a new tactic: eliminating the teaching of evolution and
other sciences that complement evolution, such as geology, paleontology,
and biological anthropology. By doing so, they are not only endangering
church-state separation but also seriously jeopardizing the science
education of future generations.

http://www.campusfreethought.org/sos/