From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d79efdb8dde2c5a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x25g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Phil Thornley <phil.jpthornley@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SPARK : third example for Roesetta - reviewers welcome
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <3835bfd7-ea68-440a-8c38-64e8922fc8b0@x25g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.vhguffh3ule2fv@garhos>
 <87aaonlk1h.fsf@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.177.171.182
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1282295192 14888 127.0.0.1 (20 Aug 2010 09:06:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x25g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.177.171.182;
 posting-account=Fz1-yAoAAACc1SDCr-Py2qBj8xQ-qC2q
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13529
Date: 2010-08-20T02:06:32-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 15 Aug, 21:04, Jacob Sparre Andersen <spa...@nbi.dk> wrote:
> Yannick Duch=EAne wrote:
[...]
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 subtype Index_Type is Integer range 1 .. 100; -- Arbitrary =
limits.
>
> Is there really any need to make this a subtype of Integer? =A0Shouldn't
> it rather be a completely independent type:

I've left this as a subtype of Integer in the updated version on
Rosetta Code.  The main reason is that an independent type would need
a base type assertion adding - which will just be noise to a casual
browser with only a small benefit gained.
(IMHO of course - and it's a Wiki, so ...)

Cheers,

Phil