From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,932ab97db73b73f4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Wes Groleau Subject: Re: Ada lives? Date: 1999/11/19 Message-ID: <3835C302.EE64260C@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 550702922 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3835B21C.FFEF5C51@averstar.com> X-Accept-Language: en,es,fr,pt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@icg.raytheon.com X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 943047451 151.168.144.162 (Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:37:31 CST) Organization: Raytheon Company MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:37:31 CST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > It depends on the market. In safety-critical systems, Ada is > a major player. In desktop applications, Ada is a negligent > player. To nit-pick a little slip: Ada may be negligible in that domain, but "negligent" describes _people_ who don't use Ada in safety-critical systems. :-)