From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e3785b223d2fe9b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Matthew Heaney" Subject: Re: Help withing Operators Date: 1999/11/18 Message-ID: <38344623_1@news1.prserv.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 550212663 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <810os4$lko$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net X-Trace: 18 Nov 1999 18:32:03 GMT, 32.101.8.170 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services Mime-version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <810os4$lko$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> , "Hovers" wrote: > I want to find out how you overide a large number of operators. Be more specific about what you're trying to do. Give a *small* but complete set of code. Do you want to "override" operators of a type? Or keep the operators, but make them directly visible at their point of use? Do you want to override the operators of a tagged type or nontagged type? Do you want to override only the "operatORS," or do you mean all the "operatIONS" of the type? > I know you > can overwrite them one at a time, but if all the operators are contained > within a package, can you, in some way with that package's operators? You can get direct visibility to the operators by using a "use type" clause, or by renaming just the ones you're interested in. But you said override, so I'm not sure "use type" is what you want. BTW: why do you want to override the operators of a type? -- I see no good reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious feelings of anyone. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species