From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8201deea80f1752a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: darrellhiggins@uswest.net (Darrell Higgins) Subject: Re: 3-bit array porting problem from ADA83 to GreenHills ADA95 Date: 1999/11/13 Message-ID: <382ce33d.156888059@news.uswest.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 548012045 References: <382386fe.85782690@news.uswest.net> X-Trace: news.uswest.net 942465766 216.161.182.196 (Fri, 12 Nov 1999 22:02:46 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 22:02:46 CST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: To follow up on the 3-bit array problem with Green Hills ADA, Mr. Miexner from GH contacted our company to say that activity on this thread has spurred them to reevaluate the odd size array support for the compiler. They believe an update will be available within 30 days - which would coincide nicely with our projects design review milestone! I will post a follow up message upon receipt of the update. On Sat, 06 Nov 1999 01:51:35 GMT, darrellhiggins@uswest.net (Darrell Higgins) wrote: >Has anybody dealt (successfully) with a port of ADA83 that contains >3-bit arrays of enumerated types into GH ADA95? GreenHills does not >support 3-bit arrays and we are searching for techniques/solutions to >achieve this port. >Our application constrains us to keep the arrays, due to the high LOC >affected. So how about it...Trash the compiler and look for a new one? >Be kind in reply - I'm a nervous ADA newbie.