From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a744520307161f16
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Jordan <robert.l.jordan@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: MMAP in ADA?
Date: 1999/11/05
Message-ID: <382356F2.4E6FA7C9@boeing.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 544993966
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nntp@news.boeing.com (Boeing NNTP News Access)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: e897317.knt.boeing.com
References: <38223922.7763122E@boeing.com> <7vur6c$o3n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: The Boeing Company
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I just found that out.  Apex doesn't implement Annex E and that's a
shame since I'm tasked with using Apex only.  

Robert Dewar wrote:

> In any case, GNAT is the only Ada 95 implementation that
> contains a full implementation of Annex E, so in practice
> you will be *more* portable using mmap directly here, not less.
> (also I don't think the GNAT implementation is what you want
> here in any case).
> 
> Robert Dewar
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.