From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e80a1497a689d8a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Tucker Taft Subject: Re: Ada and GC. Was: Re: Ammo-zilla Date: 1999/11/01 Message-ID: <381DD258.B6B11153@averstar.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 543167058 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: houdini.burl.averstar.com References: <38120FAF.945ADD7D@hso.link.com> <7uutgd$87h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991024.18033546@db3.max5.com> <38189268.43EB150F@mail.earthlink.net> <86ogdjtdwz.fsf@ppp-115-70.villette.club-internet.fr> <7vadsp$8q61@news.cis.okstate.edu> <1999Oct28.221910.1@eisner> <7vb3c4$8a21@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7vhg2n$7ht$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7vht9i$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: AverStar (formerly Intermetrics) Burlington, MA USA Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Vladimir Olensky wrote: > ... > 1. In a system that gives you a choice to use TRACED or UNTRACED > by GC objects just do not use TRACED objects if you don't want > them to be moved by GC from one memory location to another. By the way, don't you generally need to do reference counting rather than tracing-based GC if you have some traced and some untraced objects? If not, how do you deal with pointers to traced objects that exist in untraced objects? (Perhaps disallow at compile-time?) > ... > Regards, > Vladimir Olensky -- -Tucker Taft stt@averstar.com http://www.averstar.com/~stt/ Technical Director, Distributed IT Solutions (www.averstar.com/tools) AverStar (formerly Intermetrics, Inc.) Burlington, MA USA