From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30e3597af28a3026 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: Simple algorithmic question I hope :-) Date: 1999/10/28 Message-ID: <3818B721.26FCF4A5@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 541796570 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7uuuba$8s4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19991025071337.29192.00000857@ng-fa1.aol.com> <7v255q$eth$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7va4ns$898$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: A quick reflexion on Ada capitalization: at least with C they avoided (a part of) the problem... About psychanalysis and the <> trend in computing, or, how to put modern clothes (visual,OO) to old debris, I just discovered that mental regression in that area doesn't need the `++' disguisement. The true regression proudly show its '--' (I'm a totally unfair...): http://www.research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/c--.html -- Gautier _____\\________________\_______\ http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/