From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,37ed89588a753b4c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-18 05:09:30 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!lab.ultra.nyu.edu!kenner
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ARPA still undermining Ada
Date: 18 Oct 1994 11:19:31 GMT
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Message-ID: <380b03$ehn@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>
References: <37u1h3$hpd@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <37uif1$i27@oahu.cs.ucla.edu>
 <37v9eu$dij@siberia.gatech.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lab.ultra.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-10-18T11:19:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37v9eu$dij@siberia.gatech.edu> jmills@ccrf-news.gatech.edu (John M. Mills) writes:
>I don't pretend to speak for Mr. Stallman, but I thought emacs was written
>in Lisp. Does that suggest anything?

I don't think any version of emacs was written in Lisp.

The original version of emacs was written in TECO and GNU emacs is
written in C.  There may have been a version in between that was
written in Lisp, but I doubt it.