From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9240e56bacaf630 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Matthew Heaney" Subject: Re: Generic abstract procedures Date: 1999/10/14 Message-ID: <38068800_1@news1.prserv.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 536900367 Distribution: world Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <38062215_1@news1.prserv.net> <380685f5_4@news1.prserv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net X-Trace: 15 Oct 1999 01:48:48 GMT, 129.37.62.78 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services Mime-version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <380685f5_4@news1.prserv.net> , "Matthew Heaney" wrote: > In article , lutz@iks-jena.de > (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote: > > >> I'm going to implement a Iterator pattern. > [snip] >> My question is: Does anybody already solved such a problem in an elegant way? > > See my article "Iterator and Factory Method Patterns Combined," in the > Nov 1998 design patterns archive, for some ideas. Oops! I forgot to provide a URL: Matt -- Evolution is as well documented as any phenomenon in science, as strongly as the earth's revolution around the sun rather than vice versa. Stephen Jay Gould, Time, 23 Aug 1999