From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a494c03083dd910d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Marin David Condic Subject: Re: creating folders and sub folders Date: 1999/10/14 Message-ID: <380650A3.CA33B9E9@pwfl.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 536831022 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: condicma@bogon.pwfl.com References: <7te0hb$62h$1@minus.oleane.net> <38029F67.66CC39FF@callnetuk.com> <7tvei6$oke$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7u4oko$nqv$1@minus.oleane.net> <7u555v$v9a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Pratt & Whitney Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: e108678@pwflcom Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Vladimir Olensky wrote: > better not to bother to spend time for that. Many times > I noticed that occasionally people spend much more time > and efforts explaining and reasoning why they won't give > the answer or explaining what one should do before asking > that question though giving direct answer or hint would > take twice (or even more) less time. > Maybe the most polite approach should be "The short answer is XXX and you can find a detailed answer by looking at YYY" where YYY isn't too general. (A specific URL, the title/author of a book, or some reasonably detailed guide as to how to get there.) Its easy for all of us who have been around for a while to take for granted a certain body of experience. And if we hang around this newsgroup enough, its easy for us to remember the thousands of times the same questions came up. I suppose every high school teacher gets tired of the same dumb questions every school year too. We can get a new crop of "students" every day. :-) > > The only valid reason for irritation is when the SAME person > asks the SAME question more times than addressed person > tolerance threshold which is different for different people > (from 0 to infinity:-). I know I have lots of patience for the merely ignorant and even the lazy (smart?) who might find it easier to ask than to dig for the answer themselves. (I recall a study that indicated engineers received 75% of their information from talking to each other on the job rather than looking in books or any other sources.) I'd have to admit to having my patience go asymptotic towards zero when confronted with someone who makes the same mistake repeatedly - or wants to cheat on school projects. > > People with tolerance threshould = 0 should not try > to answer at all :-) > Wise advice. But we all occasionally like to play the role of Newsgroup Police. Maybe its the flashy uniforms and nightsticks. :-) MDC -- Marin David Condic Real Time & Embedded Systems, Propulsion Systems Analysis United Technologies, Pratt & Whitney, Large Military Engines M/S 731-95, P.O.B. 109600, West Palm Beach, FL, 33410-9600 ***To reply, remove "bogon" from the domain name.*** Visit my web page at: http://www.mcondic.com/