From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2807a72eaf629c11
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Apex 3.0.0b can't handle dynamic positional agregates?
Date: 1999/10/14
Message-ID: <380627BA.81A7A9C0@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 536768223
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37FE1232.EB0AD5EE@boeing.com>
X-Accept-Language: en,es,fr,pt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: news@icg.raytheon.com
X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 939927406 151.168.144.162 (Thu,
 14 Oct 1999 13:56:46 CDT)
Organization: Raytheon Company
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:56:46 CDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-10-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> stuff : stuff_type := (first, second, third, Others => Too_Many);
> But Apex 3.0.0.b comes back with an error:
> [MID] Unimplemented feature: dynamic positional aggregate with Others.

Send a report to support@rational.com

> Apex claims to be ADA95 compliant, so how can they have Unimplemented
> features which are not related to the annexes?

Is it mentioned on the validation report?