From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f805ceba146bd74
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-13 09:54:37 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!uunet!eco.twg.com!news
From: lance@eco.twg.com (Lance Kibblewhite)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994
Date: 12 Oct 1994 18:35:44 GMT
Organization: The Wollongong Group, East Coast Operations
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <37haa0$baf@scoop.eco.twg.com>
References: <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: lance@eco.twg.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: tao.eco.twg.com
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-6
Date: 1994-10-12T18:35:44+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu>, adanews@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Ada Information Clearinghouse) writes:
>*****************************************************************
>            ATTENTION Ada 95 VENDORS AND DEVELOPERS!
>*****************************************************************
>DATELINE:  October 7, 1994
>
>The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Center for Standards
>would like to invite your participation in the finalization of an
>Ada 95 Mapping to the Object Management Group's Common Object
>Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Interface Design Language
>(IDL). 
>      
>MITRE and Objective Interface Systems (OIS) have developed a draft
>Ada 95 mapping document and are preparing implementations based on
 ^^^^^^
>the mapping.  The ACM SIGAda Bindings Working Group is preparing an
>Ada 83 mapping that will be compatible with the Ada 95 mapping. 
 ^^^^^^

So is "Ada 95" more 'correct' then "Ada 94"?

-- Lance.