From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bd40601768eaf8fd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Array of Variant Records Question...
Date: 1999/09/10
Message-ID: <37d9a018@news1.prserv.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 523596868
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <7r5vh3$imu1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com> <37d6a45c@news1.prserv.net>
 <eExB3.6$ZR.1146@news.wenet.net> <37d6ccb6@news1.prserv.net>
 <7r77i8$i08$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37d7c116@news1.prserv.net>
 <7r8t21$ov5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37d822a1@news1.prserv.net>
 <37D96905.2D10D264@rational.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net
X-Trace: 11 Sep 1999 00:19:36 GMT, 32.101.8.205
Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
Mime-version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37D96905.2D10D264@rational.com> , Mark Lundquist 
<mark@rational.com>  wrote:

> Do you mean that you want to be able to modify the formal parameter?

Yes.

> (But if that were the case, why is Address_To_Access_Conversion the
> workaround, instead of just declaring a variable and assigning it the
> parameter value?)

Won't work for limited types (like Generator).


> Or do you mean you want to modify the actual parameter, as if it were mode 'in
> out'?

Yes.