From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,100eb0a59892e906
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v28g2000hsv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Sven <sven.weidauer@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to pass around access types to interfaces?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <37c7a1b3-d5c3-4a3c-a032-e70ba59d3473@v28g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <c5772601-5fc5-4f2c-a75d-241accf9072d@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
	<031d5069-6195-4d22-ae8c-1cc6c2985ea8@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.193.37.76
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1224924891 19436 127.0.0.1 (25 Oct 2008 08:54:51
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v28g2000hsv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.193.37.76;
	posting-account=oTiqeAoAAAAm9MRakyssPfX9BEL3QpPS
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_5_5; de-de)
	AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.20.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8218
Date: 2008-10-25T01:54:50-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 24 Okt., 23:32, sjw <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 12:45=A0pm, Sven <sven.weida...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to get this code to run:
>
> > in some package:
> > =A0 type My_Interface is interface;
> > =A0 type My_Interface_Access is access all My_Interface'Class;
>
> > =A0 procedure Do_Something( Item : in out Some_Object; With :
> > My_Interface_Access );
>
> Does your compiler let you use the reserved word 'with' as the name of
> a parameter? That could confuse things ..

I guess not. My real code looks different, I just made those names up
to show what my problem is. That was easier than to strip down my
actual code to just the problem.