From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c89a4b067758a6e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ? Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:34:34 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <37b7e369-01c8-4adf-8d1e-c40fa7e51cea@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> References: <4a448c5c-a4ed-446f-bb8b-67c5ba99927a@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <47bbfb5b$1@news.post.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1203503675 524 127.0.0.1 (20 Feb 2008 10:34:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197; posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20040924,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19906 Date: 2008-02-20T02:34:34-08:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > Jeffrey R. Carter schrieb: > > X (Y) cannot represent a type cast because Ada does not have anything > > called "type cast". > > Not quite, if you consider "type cast" is a unchecked bit pattern copy - > so if you define: Jeffrey is correct; it is not a "type cast", it is a "type conversion" and there is no such thing as "Ada.Unchecked_Cast". Yes, this is nit- picking; why would we choose Ada if we didn't care about details and wording? -- Ludovic Brenta.