From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: GNAT listing file default names (was: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses) Date: 1999/09/28 Message-ID: <37F0B922.4F973BC0@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530274372 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky> <7smp30$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <7sp8m9$a6e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Sep28.074901.1@eisner> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > With DEC Ada, one has default/recommended source file names > for specification and body of: > > MYPACKAGE_.ADA MYPACKAGE.ADA (...) BTW one can put both specification and body in MYPACKAGE.ADA (DEC Ada 3.* at least), which I almost always do under DEC. An ideal (personal view...) naming for GNAT files would be .ads : spec. only .adb : body only .ada or .asb : spec. + body G.