From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Geoff Bull Subject: Re: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses. Date: 1999/09/28 Message-ID: <37F0B4AA.9776B8EA@acenet.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 530269405 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@telstra.net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 938521746 203.35.118.1 (Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:29:06 EST) Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:29:06 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: the middleman wrote: > I > was wondering if anyone could possibly point out the weaknesses and the > strengths that Ada95 has when compared to other languages such as C This may be useful for you: http://www.adahome.com/Ammo/cpp2ada.html http://www.adaic.org/intro/ http://www.adaic.org/docs/flyers/choose-ada.html Where I work, the C++ programmers are always asking to buy more BoundsChecker licenses. With Ada, such a tool is rarely useful. Ditto for Java.