From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4270306b16722b81
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mark Lundquist <mark@rational.com>
Subject: Re: The International standard paper on Ada !!
Date: 1999/09/22
Message-ID: <37E9B55C.4221FAA9@rational.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 528523681
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7s5285$3f4$1@hiline.shinbiro.com>
 <37E6B403.3AB0F09F@averstar.com> <37E79DB3.9EE51A39@pwfl.com>
 <7saq0m$b7f$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37E90673.697F68E1@pwfl.com>
Organization: Rational Software
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marin David Condic wrote:

> I know Ada has the ability to do most or all of what you can do with C++ in
> terms of interfacing to all those spiffy tools, but it still lacks a nice,
> full up, one-stop-shopping, kit where you get the whole ball of wax in one
> shot. Sure, you can pull things together from a variety of sources and get
> the same capabilities, but that's difficult and tends to force you to be
> spending time fooling with the toolset rather than moving the mission
> forward.

That is absolutely right.

Mark