From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2436a05996a83c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Mark A Biggar Subject: Re: Constructing a modular type based on the size of an arbitrary type Date: 1999/09/14 Message-ID: <37DE9983.454243@lmco.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 525087226 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37DE8C45.A40AFE78@ssd.fsi.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Lockheed Martin M&DS Western Region Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Mike Bates wrote: > > I am writing a generic package in which I need to be able to construct > a modular type with the same size in bits as an arbitrary packed type > passed in as a generic parameter. (This is to be able to do unchecked > conversions between the arbitrary type and modular types; so they need > to be the same size.) This is what I tried: > > generic > type Arbitrary_Type is private; > package Foo is > > type Modular_Type is mod Arbitrary_Type'Size ** 2; > > end Foo; > > The definition of Modular_Type fails because the value > Arbitrary_Type'Size ** 2 is not static. (This surprises me, because > the value is determinable at compile time.) > > I also tried the following, relying on the instantiator to pass in > the value of Arbitrary_Type'Size ** 2: > > generic > Arbitrary_Modulus : Natural; > package Foo is > > type Modular_Type is mod Arbitrary_Type; > > end Foo; > > This also fails, again because the modulus expression is not > static, even though it seems that it should determinable at compile > time. It fails even if I use a numeric literal as the actual > parameter in the instantiation. > > Is there any way to construct a modular type to match the size of > an arbitrary type? Or is this as impossible as trisecting the angle? Unfortunately, I beleive the only way to handle this is to move the burden of defining the appropriate modular type out of the generic and pass it in as a generic parameter along with the conversion functions. generic type Arbitrary_type is private; type Abritrary_mod is mod <>; with function To(X: Arbitrary_Type) return Arbitrary_Mod; with function From(X: Arbitrary_Mod) return Arbitrary_Type; package Foo is ... end Foo; If you want to make sure it is set up right you can have package Foo check at run time in the body. package body Foo is ... begin if Arbitrary_Type'SIZE /= Arbitrary_Mod'SIZE then raise Constraint_Error; end if; end Foo; Yes, I know that this moves a lot of the provate stuff of the package outside, but I don't beleive there is any other way. -- Mark Biggar mark.a.biggar@lmco.com