From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9f437cff8842e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Alex <busato@newtech.it>
Subject: Re: Enumeration representation
Date: 1999/09/13
Message-ID: <37DCA2C7.EAB603AE@newtech.it>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 524363532
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37D8E3BC.175DB72C@newtech.it>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Centro Servizi Interbusiness
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thank you very much for your answers.
Ciao,
Alessandro

Alex wrote:

> I've written the following example program for testing enumeration
> represetantion clause:
>
> with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
>
> procedure MainEnum is
>
>       type Status is (a,b,c,d,e);
>       pragma Discard_Names(Status);
>
>       for Status use
>        ( a => 0,
>          b => 20,
>          c => 400,
>          d => 800,
>          e => 1600);
>
>        S : Status;
> begin
>       S := b;
>       Put(" => " & S'img);
> end MainEnum;
>
> I've compiled it with Gnat (the latest version)
> the output of program is 1 but I was expecting another value : 20.
> Does  Gnat support this clause?
> Did I use this clause badly?
>
> Thank you very much,
> by
> Alessandro Busato
> busato@newtech.it