From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5c7d7b754dfe430e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Zeiram <zeiram@deathsdoor.com>
Subject: Re: Help needed: Access type to functions in generic package
Date: 1999/09/12
Message-ID: <37DBFEBF.B74D1958@deathsdoor.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 524175765
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37DBA86F.3805AA69@deathsdoor.com> <37dbe7da@news1.prserv.net>
X-Accept-Language: en,en-US,en-GB,fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sunrise.ch
X-Trace: news1.sunrise.ch 937164482 4820 194.230.15.42 (12 Sep 1999 19:28:02
 GMT)
Organization: sunrise communications ag
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Sep 1999 19:28:02 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-12T19:28:02+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



Matthew Heaney wrote :

> Why is this package generic?  Why don't you declare your array type this
> way:
>

In fact, this was just a part of the definitions of my package.
In reality, my type T_Maze is declared as private. This is due
to the fact that I also need to realize a dynamic implementation
of my software (yes, this a project from my CS course :-) )
It consequently seemed logical to create this package as a
generic one.

If I decide to use a non private type and do only a static
implementation, I know for sure your solution will work
perfect. (It was, in fact, the way I ran my first tests)

Thanks for your help.

Has anybody other ideas?

    Regards,
    Zeiram