From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9f437cff8842e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Alex <busato@newtech.it>
Subject: Enumeration representation
Date: 1999/09/10
Message-ID: <37D8E3BC.175DB72C@newtech.it>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 523336390
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Centro Servizi Interbusiness
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I've written the following example program for testing enumeration
represetantion clause:

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;


procedure MainEnum is

      type Status is (a,b,c,d,e);
      pragma Discard_Names(Status);

      for Status use
       ( a => 0,
         b => 20,
         c => 400,
         d => 800,
         e => 1600);

       S : Status;
begin
      S := b;
      Put(" => " & S'img);
end MainEnum;

I've compiled it with Gnat (the latest version)
the output of program is 1 but I was expecting another value : 20.
Does  Gnat support this clause?
Did I use this clause badly?

Thank you very much,
by
Alessandro Busato
busato@newtech.it