From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,88d659ec3d2f4e22,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: G <Dizzy@interact.net.au>
Subject: addendum (to question on cpu, task, more)
Date: 1999/09/10
Message-ID: <37D8E172.531A942C@interact.net.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 523333529
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Humanity
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I have no experience with these sorts of thing.  So, I have no idea in
what
way multiple processors are grouped together.  I looked at my previous
question and now it occurs that I was presuming that an individual
processor
would itself be allocated to a specific hardware function.  I don't know
if
it works that way.  You folks must.