From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f8aaabf09aa3a1a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 108abf,3f8aaabf09aa3a1a X-Google-Attributes: gid108abf,public From: Dave Holford Subject: Re: CAATS Date: 1999/08/29 Message-ID: <37C8B3AF.3CE0BCC3@cnwl.igs.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 518398487 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7q8mt7$81n$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@igs.net X-Trace: news.igs.net 935900077 29701 216.58.8.170 (29 Aug 1999 04:14:37 GMT) Organization: IGS - Information Gateway Services Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 1999 04:14:37 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,rec.aviation.military Date: 1999-08-29T04:14:37+00:00 List-Id: Wow, If CAATS is up and playing I wonder why no one has used it yet. Dave Tarver Engineering wrote: > > Joe Wisniewski wrote in message <7q8mt7$81n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>... > >(Slightly off charter for r.a.m. but couldn't find a closer aviation- > >related n.g.) > > > >What is the status of CAATS (Canadian Air Traffic Control system) > >being fielded by Raytheon out of Vancouver)? I know that this was > >supposed to be a very complex "Ada95 distributed objects" > >implementation. I know that there was a Tri-Ada presentation a > >couple of years ago relating to some aspects of the design/architecture. > > > >There seems to very little info out in the public > >domain on this project, or I am just not finding it? > >It is interesting because I would think that > >any "good news" from CAATS would have been used to offset some of > >the STARS "setbacks", if you want to call it that, over the last year. > > CAATS was up and playing before changes to make STARS. Maybe the people > that fixed CAATS to make STARS don't want to talk about it. > > John