From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1bad3dcf22d5a071 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Martin Dowie Subject: Re: Generics and parameter modes Date: 1999/08/21 Message-ID: <37BEEA97.5A78CDFA@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 515554572 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dowie-cs.demon.co.uk:193.237.34.207 References: <37B85F88.C87638C4@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk> <37B991F7.79D30959@averstar.com> <37BE694D.46B883BA@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk> <7pmaj1$jpn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 935258752 nnrp-09:17419 NO-IDENT dowie-cs.demon.co.uk:193.237.34.207 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: sensible - yes is it happening - no :-( Robert Dewar wrote: > Tucker said > > > > ObjectAda would pass such an object by reference unless the > > > actual > > > were misaligned (maladjusted? ;-), marked atomic or > > > volatile, or had > > > a C_Pass_By_Copy convention. > > As would GNAT, indeed it is hard to imagine any other sensible > implementation choice! > > Robert Dewar > Ada Core Technologies > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.