From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,33ec2881cc3ecf36 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Geoff Bull Subject: Re: ada < - > java bindings wanted Date: 1999/08/22 Message-ID: <37BEB3BB.78C0B230@acenet.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 515491745 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37BD0169.B49F73A5@acenet.com.au> <7pjm8u$on1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@telstra.net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 935245118 203.35.118.1 (Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:18:38 EST) Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:18:38 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > In article <37BD0169.B49F73A5@acenet.com.au>, > Geoff Bull wrote: > > > It is open source with a license intended to be less > > restrictive than GPL, > > I would really encourage people not to come up with > idiosyncratic open sources licenses of their own. My company owns the code, we can put whatever license we like on it! If you don't like the code, or are simply not interested in it, I can't imagine you care too much about the license. If you like the code and the license is a problem for you, we can be probably convinced to use a different license. You might find "idiosyncratic" licenses a problem. However, for us, code that is straight GPL or LGPL is a problem.