From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,10444cff97404845 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: C like op= proposal Date: 1999/08/17 Message-ID: <37B922A2.AE755A08@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 513720062 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37B7D172.DCE02FFA@Maths.UniNe.CH> <7papqs$8if$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John Duncan wrote: > > a(b(c,d+e(f,g)).h(i,j)) := a(b(c,d+e(f,g)).h(i,j)) + 1; > 1. Who is writing this code? Not me, but it exists and I assure you that "a(b(c,d+e(f,g)).h(i,j))" is not a badly written expression in that context... > 2. Is this code being looped through so many times that the optimization is > going to cause a significant decrease on execution times? I've seen such things in the heart of quintuple loops in critical parts of a program, so I guess that an optimization is welcome... > 3. For whom is the ++ solution optimal? What a question! -- Gautier -------- http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/