From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f891f,1f886b0b57302687 X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f866c3318ce8fa68 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Gautier Subject: Re: take the 20 second lang. survey Date: 1999/08/14 Message-ID: <37B59C62.27939754@maths.unine.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 512770711 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37B4B3F0.77E6C59A@netplus.net> <37B53B2E.93F493C@maths.unine.ch> <7p40ge$7la@web.nmti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Ada is object oriented? I know it has operator overloading, but that's only > a small part of OO. The Ada*95* standard has brought inheritance, classes, etc. There is no prefixed notation - so 2 kinds of objects can be parameters of a method or a binary operator without jaleaousy... Procedural and OO can live happily together, it seems. Surely people more advanced in OO programming in Ada will comtribute to the discussion... Note that the Ada 83 has already an inheritance notion with subtypes. -- Gautier -------- http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/