From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 125171,ec6f7069644a238f X-Google-Attributes: gid125171,public X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,ec6f7069644a238f X-Google-Attributes: gid113ae9,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,ec6f7069644a238f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec6f7069644a238f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Stanley R. Allen" Subject: Re: ada < - > java bindings wanted Date: 1999/08/12 Message-ID: <37B33F0D.BF1831D8@hso.link.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 512012108 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: boeing.comp.java,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer Date: 1999-08-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Constantine A. Sismanidis" wrote: > > We need to be able to call java from an ada main routine (we plan to build > the user interface in java), and to have java call the legacy ada code. We > will be using Rational's ada compiler. We *can* get this to work by having > ada call C which will then call java (using the Java Native Interface); or > java calling C (using the Java Native Interface), which will then call ada. > However, we would very much prefer to call java directly from ada, and ada > from java, in order to avoid the extra layers of code that would be > required. > See http://www.ainslie-software.com for the product AdaJNI. -- Stanley Allen mailto:s_allen@hso.link.com