From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2308afbbe4ecec0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Steve Quinlan <steven.quinlan@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Subverting 'Access for Sub-programs
Date: 1999/08/05
Message-ID: <37A9BF34.B541E928@lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 509241397
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37A71EF1.2201@dera.gov.uk> <37A7FDE8.4F5@dera.gov.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@inetserv2
X-Trace: inetserv2.fs.lmco.com 933871413 18108 158.187.25.141 (5 Aug 1999
 16:43:33 GMT)
Organization: Lockheed-Martin Air Traffic Management
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Aug 1999 16:43:33 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-08-05T16:43:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I don't think I saw anyone suggest that an integer parameter could be added
to Database.Perform. If, when you call that routine, you always know the the
value which you wish passed in to the action_type subprogram, then you're
fine. Then Perform has both the subprogram to call and the value needed to
call it as parameters.