From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32f54b2230c68d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Rod Chapman Subject: Re: Compilers for VAX Was: Ada version of C's 'static' Date: 1999/08/04 Message-ID: <37A7EEF4.160F1A55@praxis-cs.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 508688715 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7n03us$862$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3798EDE9.90B9623B@averstar.com> <7nsuf3$tm9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <1999Aug3.155033.62042@ludens> <7o8ac7$iti$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@uk.uu.net X-Trace: soap.pipex.net 933753014 22909 194.129.236.147 (4 Aug 1999 07:50:14 GMT) Organization: UUNET WorldCom server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNET WorldCom Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Aug 1999 07:50:14 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-04T07:50:14+00:00 List-Id: > > I do not know of any validated Ada 95 compilers for the VAX Anyone know how difficult it would be to construct a GNAT targetting VAX/VMS? Has anyone ever tried such a port? Oddly, we'd really like such a thing, so we could move our source base away from Ada83, while still supporting our VAX/VMS customers... - Rod