From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,22fbdbb6ab08eb4a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: William Starner <billeug@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Basic questions about Ada95
Date: 1999/07/29
Message-ID: <37A143FD.762B1C06@worldnet.att.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 506874073
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <933315145.641@www.remarq.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net 933315712 7396 208.255.134.204 (30 Jul 1999
 06:21:52 GMT)
Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: billeug@worldnet.att.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jul 1999 06:21:52 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-30T06:21:52+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ronald Caudill wrote:
> 2.Is the size of the executables in an acceptable range?

Why don't you try it and see? If you're worried about the question, you
obviously have some idea what an "acceptable" range is, but the rest of us don't
know what you consider acceptable. The best way is to compile a program and see.
Also, ls -l GNAT and see if that's what you consider reasonable for an
optimizing compiler.