From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2485cb1936a0a4ec,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch>
Subject: Package with initialization only
Date: 1999/07/21
Message-ID: <37961DD6.E56BD3E9@maths.unine.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 503630532
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi everybody!

A small "aesthetic" problem: I have a package with initialization only;
thus I must add a dummy procedure to resolve the with/without body
ambiguity Ada95 doesn't accept. There is surely a more elegant formulation,
surely with OO, since the initialization procedure affects the public
variable of the package. Its present state:

----****
with Engine_3D;

package Vehic001 is

  vehicle_001: Engine_3D.Object_3D( Max_points=> 100, Max_faces=> 86 );

private

  procedure dummy_proc;

end Vehic001;
----****

-- 
Gautier

--------
http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/