From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8660fe29f138b478
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com>
Subject: Re: Freezing question
Date: 1999/07/19
Message-ID: <379347D8.A902583C@averstar.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 502751070
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: houdini.burl.averstar.com
References: <7mlg18$qk0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <378E57FE.FA7EEB99@averstar.com>
 <7mnc3q$f6r$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: AverStar (formerly Intermetrics)  Burlington, MA  USA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> In article <378E57FE.FA7EEB99@averstar.com>,
>   Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> > Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> > >    type Fruit is abstract tagged private;
> > >    type Apple is abstract new Fruit with private;
> 
> > I suppose another problem is that, for a private extension, the
> > set of inherited operations is determined by those of the ancestor
> > at the point where the private extension is declared.
> 
> Ahhh. I bet that's it. Does that mean that in the example above, Apple
> will inherit *none* of Fruit's operations, since none of them were
> declared before Apple?

Correct.  See 7.3.1(7).

> --
> T.E.D.

-- 
-Tucker Taft   stt@averstar.com   http://www.averstar.com/~stt/
Technical Director, Distributed IT Solutions  (www.averstar.com/tools)
AverStar (formerly Intermetrics, Inc.)   Burlington, MA  USA