From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,865e31ac5a1b553a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Gautier <Gautier.deMontmollin@Maths.UniNe.CH>
Subject: Re: GNAT -vs- ObjectAda (was Re: where is the faq)
Date: 1999/07/19
Message-ID: <37934616.F82715F2@Maths.UniNe.CH>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 502751067
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7mneah$g5j$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <DJJj3.291$Yp6.13826@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
 <3790b774.0@news.pacifier.com>
To: Steve Doiel <steved@pacifier.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> We have compiled and ran our code under both ObjectAda and GNAT.
> The code compiled under GNAT tends to run approximately 2X the
> speed.

Same rate experienced when choosing a new compiler for a commercial
program (~100'000 LOC). What is surprising is that the old Alsys
compiler seemed to produce compact and fast code... maybe not
fit for present bloatware demand...

-- 
Gautier

--------
http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/