From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cb4fe85a63285efc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Pascal MALAISE Subject: Re: Any have GNAT running on linux Date: 1999/07/18 Message-ID: <37919764.48840A3C@magic.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 502334986 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <378A95E9.FF5DEE51@home.com> X-Client: Magic On Line [unknown@ppp-158.net3.magic.fr] X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: news@ulysse.magic.fr X-Trace: ulysse.magic.fr 932288356 857 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 1999 08:59:16 GMT) Organization: Itaque Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jul 1999 08:59:16 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-07-18T08:59:16+00:00 List-Id: Richard Wallace wrote: > I'm running into a few problems installing GNAT on Red Hat 6.0. I > downloaded gnat-3.11p-i686-pc-linux-gnu-bin.tar.gz Me too, but not the same problems. which option of doconfig did you choose? Running the doconfig with option 2 (Install GCC C compiler and GNAT files in the standard GCC locations) works correctly... it installs gcc version 2.8.1 instead of/beside the egcs provided by red hat. Gnat compiler runs OK (gcc, gnatmake...) but the executables it produces core in some _IO_sebuf... A glance at dejanews shows that I'm not alone in this case: the glibc-2.1.1 is not compatible enough with the glibc-2.0 gnat 3.11p was build with. Some people report they successfully downgraded their glibc to 2.0!!! My question is: did anyone try to install gnat 3.11p from the sources on top of glibc-2.1.1? Anyone aware of a gnat runtime library already compiled with this glibc? Thank's -- Pascal MALAISE (priv) mailto:malaise@magic.fr (prof) mailto:malaise@fr.airsysatm.thomson-csf.com