From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbf2f325f33ce35,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Dr. Neil C. Audsley" Subject: Elimination of "use" clauses Date: 1999/07/01 Message-ID: <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 495983736 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: nca2@york.ac.uk X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@york.ac.uk X-Trace: pump1.york.ac.uk 930829938 14168 144.32.41.44 (1 Jul 1999 11:52:18 GMT) Organization: The University of York, UK Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Neil.Audsley@cs.york.ac.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Jul 1999 11:52:18 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-07-01T11:52:18+00:00 List-Id: We have a lot of Ada source that "with"s and "use"s a lot of packages -- to the extent that it is difficult and time-consuming to find out which package a procedure is actually from. Ideally, we would like to eliminate "use" clauses, necessitating the replacement of each procedure call X by PackageName.X instead. Is there a tool that does this? -- ========================================================================= Dr. Neil C. Audsley Email: neil@cs.york.ac.uk Senior Research Fellow Phone: +44-1904-432787 Department of Computer Science, Fax: +44-1904-432708 University of York, York. Y01 5DD, UK