From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f44aef4f5aee18
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Gautier <Gautier.deMontmollin@Maths.UniNe.CH>
Subject: Re: Access to procedures
Date: 1999/06/28
Message-ID: <377765AD.ECFAFF7B@Maths.UniNe.CH>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 494739105
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906270946040.19516-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <7l5vpm$mfq@lotho.delphi.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> How about "Use Unrestricted_Access when appropriate, but don't
> make a habit of it".  There are almost always better ways to solve
> the problem.  Practice learning and using them.

I'll put a word about it in the "readme". Note that the library
itself doesn't use "unrestricted_access"; it's even almost Ada83:
the previous versions did compile under DEC Ada!

-- 
Gautier