From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f44aef4f5aee18
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Gautier <Gautier.deMontmollin@Maths.UniNe.CH>
Subject: Re: Access to procedures
Date: 1999/06/26
Message-ID: <3774FAC2.39EEB49E@Maths.UniNe.CH>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 494164349
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <37737285.5CF9ED5F@Maths.UniNe.CH> article
 <t1Pc3.386$or1.17508@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>
To: tmoran@bix.com
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thank you for your suggestion - the idea is valuable.

In that precise context, I want to avoid making this
small unzip library depend even on the _existence_
of all that feedbacks because an intended
usage is a complete "invisible" unpacking, allowing
programs to load data from a zipped one.

The "unrestricted_access" way seems much more simple,
though - it seems - only provided by GNAT presently.

It avoids changing "with" clauses in sources or
creating dummy feedback handlers...

-- 
Gautier

--------
http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/