From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60fc398daa7dd9cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jack Florio Subject: Re: KSLOC estimates Ada vs C++ Date: 1999/06/13 Message-ID: <37646165.6E7A03AA@erols.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 489278731 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <374DCB87.6EE9BE49@lmco.com> To: ray.calande@lmco.com X-Accept-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com X-Trace: G4jrglY6bUme3XP11XSPB2PksqnN9hCNm+ZG9StkrAY= Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 1999 01:56:20 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-06-14T01:56:20+00:00 List-Id: The best comparison I'd suggest is looking at it from a Function Point perspective. Check http://www.spr.com/library/0langtbl.htm by Capers Jones. Excerpt from the list on average number of statements to implement a function point: Ada 83: 71 Ada 95: 49 C++: 53 the rest of the math is left as an exercise for the student.... ;-) Jack.Florio@lmco.com.nospam Raymond Calande wrote: > Has anyone ever seen a reference in which a comparison is done that > shows the relative size in KSLOC for Ada versus C++ for the equivalent > program? > TIA