From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,857262ad7d0ad537
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1904a679c27288b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1904a679c27288b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: martin lytz <mlytz@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use?
Date: 1999/06/11
Message-ID: <37618092.1051364@mindspring.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 488580321
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <7j1qng$4fp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37576ded.26569745@news.mpx.com.au>
 <7j8ac0$eah$1@uranium.btinternet.com> <7jh07e$tek$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jhp34$6f1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7jjij7$qci$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7jl9n3$n9j$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
 <19990610.7A689D8.FF4B@mojaveg.ridgecrest.ca.us>
 <7jro57$nti$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37617593.28966751@192.168.2.34>
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Server-Date: 11 Jun 1999 21:29:49 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,gnu.misc.discuss
Date: 1999-06-11T21:29:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

This post has become very, very prolonged and off topic from the original
post.  Could you please refrain from using bandwidth for the ada wars
please?  Ada is wonderful.  Forth is wonderful.  C is wonderful.  C++ is
wonderful.  Assembly is wonderful.  Java is wonderful. All others are
wonderful too.


Dave Hansen wrote:

> This is probably too widely posted, but I can't help myself...
>
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 19:30:47 GMT, Robert Dewar
> <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
> >Note that by comparison, Java standardization has just moved
> >back to square one, with no progress at all, given Sun's
> >decision that they cannot work with ISO. It may be a long long
>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^
> >wait before Java has an international standard.
>
> Been lurking in comp.std.c?   ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>                           -=Dave
> Just my (10-010) cents
> I can barely speak for myself, so I certainly can't speak for B-Tree.
> Change is inevitable.  Progress is not.