From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,39c061fa6e3ec349
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!t7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Gautier write-only <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: acceess problem
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <375286d8-70a1-4bfc-8d3d-5699942807c1@t7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
References: <4e2c416b$0$2574$703f8584@news.kpn.nl>
 <m2fwlvzj0a.fsf@pushface.org>
 <4e2d13bc$0$2576$703f8584@news.kpn.nl> <m24o2azrwb.fsf@pushface.org>
 <8727ccd3-d7e9-4d41-b55c-9c3d4fba1a78@df3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <980bda39-954a-4b4e-8b7d-fb9597f808c0@s33g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.114.110.206
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1311768495 3227 127.0.0.1 (27 Jul 2011 12:08:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.114.110.206;
 posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HNKURAELSC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.2
 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.342.9 Safari/533.2,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:21353
Date: 2011-07-27T05:06:35-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 26 juil, 19:43, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> Although I don't like this approach, if you're going to convert an
> Address to an access object, surely it's better to use
> System.Address_To_Access_Conversions, which is designed for this sort
> of conversion, than to use Unchecked_Conversion, which assumes that a
> System.Address and the access object you're converting to have the
> same format, which isn't always the case.  There's no point in using
> "pure Ada" if it results in code that compiles on another system but
> doesn't work properly.

Could not agree more!
http://globe3d.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/globe3d/bindings/gl.adb?r1=153&r2=152&pathrev=153